On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:35:12AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 8/24/13 3:23 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 13:20, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> On 8/23/13 7:55 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>> In message <52174d51.2050...@digsys.bg>, Daniel Kalchev writes: > >>> > >>>>> - 9.x gcc default and clang in base; > >>>>> - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports; > >>>> I believe this is the best idea so far. As long as these ports work with > >>>> gcc in ports, that is. > >>> +1 > >>> > >> well as I was forced to go back to gcc to get a compiling & running > >> kernel on my VPS (xen) > >> I'm not convinced that clang is there yet. I'd be really grumpy if I > >> had to go through al the ports hoopla to recompile my kernel. > >> > >> > > Curious which Xen version. I'd like to try to replicate this issue. I've > > seen FreeBSD 10 run just fine on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2. > I don't know.. whatever RootBSD run, but the fact that I needed gcc > for anything suggests that we should keep it around for a while.
Why do you need to use gcc for everything? What happens if you use clang? Be specific, without details this is just FUD. Roman _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
