Is there any compelling reason for retaining src/lib/libm in the source tree? Yes, I realize that libm is the original libm from CSRG 4.4 BSD-lite. However, the errors noted below have been in the source since 1994 when rgrimes imported the initial sources. The only person that I can of that may have a working copy of libm is bde. Additionally, with Martin Craucer's recent FP work, I think PR i386/105 have become fixed: a [1995/01/11] i386/105 bde Distributed libm (msun) has \ non-standard error handling. -- Steve cd /usr/src/lib/libm make depend make cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libm/common_source -Dnational -c /usr/src/lib/libm/common_source/lgamma. c -o lgamma.o /usr/src/lib/libm/common_source/lgamma.c:141: syntax error before `double' *** Error code 1 (continuing) /usr/src/lib/libm/ieee/support.c: In function `scalb': /usr/src/lib/libm/ieee/support.c:91: argument `N' doesn't match prototype /usr/include/math.h:153: prototype declaration *** Error code 1 (continuing) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
