On Sunday, 2 April 2000 at 22:22:39 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Bernd Walter wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 09:39:36PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: >>> I dont think vinum is/was usable under -current at least not the >>> RAID5 stuff, its broken, and some of it is because greg is not >>> up to date with what -current looks like these days. >> >> Can you please explain what have massivly changed in current that relates >> to vinum? > > The changes done by phk to seperate out the io stuff from struct > buf. Alfred and Bernd came up with fixes that seem to work. I still need to review them, but I'm in the process of installing an up-to-date -CURRENT on my test box. Watch this space. Greg -- Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Greg Lehey
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Matthew Dillon
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Matthew Dillon
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Greg Lehey
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Greg Lehey
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste