Hi, On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:48:11 +0100 Fabian Keil <freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > My conclusion: on at least my not-so-new laptop, FreeBSD-10 can > > be used in a desktop environment if one takes some care during the > > installation. > > I'm using CURRENT on my also-no-so-new laptop since FreeBSD 7 > (I think) and came to the same conclusion. > I did this during 6.x time but got stuck then with 6.x and never went back until last May/June. > It's unfortunate that the builworld time roughly trippled since > 2010 but I guess that's progress and a more powerful system > should fix it. I certainly welcome clang in general, though. > Trippled? Are you sure? I have the feeling it is much worse than this. Was it in 2009 when I could compile world in a few minutes on my quad core. The same machine takes now hours despite having more memory. I run currently my desktop and my notebook on 10. If I stick with my policy, I would stay with 10 until 12 would be available. On the other side, it feels so outdated not to have something like the most current version. Erich _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
