On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: ... > > First of all, if you know that there is already a hardclock/statclock/* > > scheduled in [T_X, T_X+D] you just reuse that. This particular bullet > > was ""no event scheduled in [T_X, T_X+D]" so you need to generate > > a new one. > > That is true, but my main point was about merging with external events, > which I can't predict and the only way to merge is increase sleep period, > hoping for better.
ok, now i understand why you want to schedule for T_X+D. Probably one way to close this discussion would be to provide a sysctl so the sysadmin can decide which point in the interval to pick when there is no suitable callout already scheduled. cheers luigi -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL +39-050-2211611 . via Diotisalvi 2 Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
