On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote:

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Rick Macklem <[email protected]> wrote:

...

WITHOUT_KERBEROS is used other places, like telnetd. Were you aware of that?
(I just thought it would keep it consistent, but if you think it is better
 to use a different name, I don't care.)

Ah, no. I wasn't aware of that :). Given that something else has been
standardized around the tree, I agree that your approach of using
WITHOUT_KERBEROS is ok. I wasn't keen on the name just because it
could have simplified the code using a positive instead of a negative
predicate in the #ifdef.

src.conf(5) is (well, should be) authoritative for WITH_ and WITHOUT_ flags.

-Ben
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to