Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Is there any good reason why we have two different options if they can
> :only be used together?
> :
> :Greg
>
> I think it's so you can compile a kernel with INVARIANT_SUPPORT in
> in order to support dynamic load modules which may have been compiled
> with INVARIANTS.
Or so that you can compile individual files with INVARIANTS by whatever
means suits your needs. I'm aware of quite a few machines that run with
#define INVARIANTS 1 near the top of kern_malloc.c.
Cheers,
-Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
