In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Williams writes: : Too bad is not acceptable. If we want to support multi-function : PCMCIA/CardBus cards, we *must* do shared interrupts, and multi-function : cards are becoming the standard, rather than the exception. Too bad is acceptible in this context. Meaning that we can still support sharing the interrupt, but it might lock more of the kernel out than if you didn't share. That's not a big deal in the near term. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Daniel Eischen
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Nate Williams
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Daniel Eischen
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Brad Knowles
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... David Holloway
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Warner Losh
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores availa... Warner Losh
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for driv... Warner Losh
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for ... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for drivers? Warner Losh
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for drivers? Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for driv... Matthew Dillon