On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 1:28:22 pm Vitalij Satanivskij wrote:
> ok next round :) 
> 
> dhclient updated to Revision 239564 
> 
> with fxp : 
> 
> Aug 22 20:06:48 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
> Aug 22 20:06:48 home dhclient: New Subnet Mask (fxp0): 255.255.255.0
> Aug 22 20:06:48 home dhclient: New Broadcast Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.255
> Aug 22 20:06:48 home dhclient: New Routers (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.1
> Aug 22 20:06:50 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
> Aug 22 20:06:53 home dhclient: New IP Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.xx
> Aug 22 20:06:53 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
> Aug 22 20:06:53 home dhclient: New Subnet Mask (fxp0): 255.255.255.0
> Aug 22 20:06:53 home dhclient: New Broadcast Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.255
> Aug 22 20:06:53 home dhclient: New Routers (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.xx
> Aug 22 20:06:55 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
> Aug 22 20:07:01 home dhclient: New IP Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.xx
> Aug 22 20:07:01 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
> Aug 22 20:07:01 home dhclient: New Subnet Mask (fxp0): 255.255.255.0
> Aug 22 20:07:01 home dhclient: New Broadcast Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.255
> Aug 22 20:07:01 home dhclient: New Routers (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.xx
> Aug 22 20:07:03 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
> Aug 22 20:07:07 home dhclient: New IP Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.xx
> Aug 22 20:07:07 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
> Aug 22 20:07:07 home dhclient: New Subnet Mask (fxp0): 255.255.255.0
> Aug 22 20:07:07 home dhclient: New Broadcast Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.255
> Aug 22 20:07:07 home dhclient: New Routers (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.xx
> Aug 22 20:07:09 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
> Aug 22 20:07:13 home dhclient: New IP Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.xx
> Aug 22 20:07:13 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
> Aug 22 20:07:13 home dhclient: New Subnet Mask (fxp0): 255.255.255.0
> Aug 22 20:07:13 home dhclient: New Broadcast Address (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.255
> Aug 22 20:07:13 home dhclient: New Routers (fxp0): xx.xx.xx.xx
> Aug 22 20:07:15 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP

Hmm.  Perhaps we could use a debouncer to ignore "short" link flaps?  Kind of
gross (and OpenBSD doesn't do this).  For now this change basically ignores
link up events if they occur with 5 seconds of the link down event.  The 5 is
hardcoded which is kind of yuck.

Index: dhcpd.h
===================================================================
--- dhcpd.h     (revision 239564)
+++ dhcpd.h     (working copy)
@@ -209,6 +209,7 @@
        int                      dead;
        u_int16_t                index;
        int                      linkstat;
+       time_t                   linktime;
 };
 
 struct timeout {
Index: dhclient.c
===================================================================
--- dhclient.c  (revision 239564)
+++ dhclient.c  (working copy)
@@ -285,8 +285,14 @@
                            ifi->linkstat ? "up" : "down",
                            linkstat ? "up" : "down");
                        ifi->linkstat = linkstat;
-                       if (linkstat)
+
+                       /*
+                        * XXX: Hardcoded 5 second grace window on
+                        * link flaps.
+                        */
+                       if (linkstat && (cur_time - ifi->linktime) >= 5)
                                state_reboot(ifi);
+                       ifi->linktime = cur_time;
                }
                break;
        case RTM_IFANNOUNCE:
@@ -441,6 +447,7 @@
                fprintf(stderr, " got link\n");
        }
        ifi->linkstat = 1;
+       ifi->linktime = cur_time;
 
        if ((nullfd = open(_PATH_DEVNULL, O_RDWR, 0)) == -1)
                error("cannot open %s: %m", _PATH_DEVNULL);

-- 
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to