In message <[email protected]>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
>The alternative way to avoid an 'unused' warning from the compiler
>is an empty statement
>
> (void)foo;
The thing I don't like about this form, is that it doesn't communicate
your intention, only your action.
Somewhere down my TODO list I have an item to propose instead:
typedef void unused_t;
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
(unused_t)argc;
(unused_t)argv;
return (0);
}
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
