On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 04:32:35PM -0800, Doug White wrote: > I would be in favor of renaming the boot.flp to something obviously > different, like 288boot.flp, to untrain us 2.x heads that got used to the Great idea. Would you be able to make the changes locally and test a `make release'? Then all we need to do is pass the patch pass JKH. (harder to say "NO" to working code) -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fails to boot on K6/2 Joe Abley
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fails to boot on... Thierry.herbelot
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fails to boo... Joe Abley
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fails to boo... Doug White
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fails to... David O'Brien
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fail... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp... Alex Zepeda
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot... Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot... Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE ... jack
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE ... Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE ... Doug Barton
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE ... Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp... Rasmus Skaarup
- Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot... Brian Beattie