On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Jason Evans wrote: > On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 2012-04-20 21:54, Jason Evans wrote: >>> On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>>> I think the best solution would be for jemalloc to avoid using obvious >>>> names like "chunksize" for its globals, because it is basically a >>>> library that could be linked to any sort of program out there. >>>> >>>> For example, it could prefix all its internal-use only globals with >>>> "jemalloc_" or some other mangling scheme. Jason, any thoughts? >>> >>> jemalloc has optional namespace mangling support built in for just this >>> reason. I'll turn it on, hopefully today. >> >> Indeed, I had just found jemalloc/internal/private_namespace.h. :) It >> does seem to list only functions, not variables, is that right? > > Ah right, functions only. Well then, I don't have any bright ideas for > solving this problem in the short run.
I take it back. There's spotty mangling coverage for variables. I'll try to add full coverage. Jason_______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
