On 29 Mar 2012 16:49, "O. Hartmann" <ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > I was wondering if there are some objections using TMPFS for /tmp and > /var/run. > I figured out some problems with some rc.d scripts when using TMPFS for > /var/run, samba and OpenLDAP do store some informations like PID in a > subfolder of their own in /var/run, but the rc.d scripts are not > checking properly the existence of the appropritae folder (unlike "dbus" > and "hald", they check properly!). > > I already submitted two PRs, but for SAMBA, my "hack" is trivial and > obviously to clumsy, so it should be check properly. > > My question is whether there are objections using TMPFS for bot /tmp/ > and /var/run/ at this stage on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64?
Any rc script that complains about an empty /var/run is buggy- it should be assumed that it will be emptied on boot. In short, tmpfs for those two dirs should be fine. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
