on 21/01/2012 16:37 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> 
> BTW, we have a quite strange situation with spin locks in console output path.
> cnputs_mtx is marked as MTX_NOWITNESS, supposedly because cnputs (printf) can 
> be
> called in any locking context (even during normal operation).  But there are a
> number of console-specific locks (scrlock, uart_hwmtx, "syscons video lock")
> which are acquired under cnputs_mtx, but which are *not* marked as
> MTX_NOWITNESS.  More, they are specified in the witness order_lists as if we
> certainly know a correct order for them.
> I think that the msgbuf mutex also deserves mentioning in this context.
> 
> I think that all of these spin locks should be marked as MTX_NOWITNESS (as 
> long
> as they stay normal spinlocks), because printf(9) should be usable wherever I
> stick it in the code.
> 
> P.S. The above only matters for WITNESS and !WITNESS_SKIPSPIN and I am not 
> sure
> if this combination really matters.
> 

Here's my take at it:
diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_cons.c b/sys/kern/kern_cons.c
index 5346bc3..97f0f16 100644
--- a/sys/kern/kern_cons.c
+++ b/sys/kern/kern_cons.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static void
 cn_drvinit(void *unused)
 {

-       mtx_init(&cnputs_mtx, "cnputs_mtx", NULL, MTX_SPIN | MTX_NOWITNESS);
+       mtx_init(&cnputs_mtx, "cnputs_mtx", NULL, MTX_SPIN);
        use_cnputs_mtx = 1;
 }

diff --git a/sys/kern/subr_witness.c b/sys/kern/subr_witness.c
index 55cb2d7..39dd94d 100644
--- a/sys/kern/subr_witness.c
+++ b/sys/kern/subr_witness.c
@@ -629,7 +629,6 @@ static struct witness_order_list_entry order_lists[] = {
 #endif
        { "rm.mutex_mtx", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
        { "sio", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
-       { "scrlock", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
 #ifdef __i386__
        { "cy", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
 #endif
@@ -638,7 +637,6 @@ static struct witness_order_list_entry order_lists[] = {
        { "rtc_mtx", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
 #endif
        { "scc_hwmtx", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
-       { "uart_hwmtx", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
        { "fast_taskqueue", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
        { "intr table", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
 #ifdef HWPMC_HOOKS
@@ -653,8 +651,8 @@ static struct witness_order_list_entry order_lists[] = {
        { "sched lock", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
        { "td_contested", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
        { "callout", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
+       { "et_hw_mtx", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
        { "entropy harvest mutex", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
-       { "syscons video lock", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
 #ifdef SMP
        { "smp rendezvous", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
 #endif
@@ -662,6 +660,13 @@ static struct witness_order_list_entry order_lists[] = {
        { "tlb0", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
 #endif
        /*
+        * console locks
+        */
+       { "cnputs_mtx", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
+       { "scrlock", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
+       { "syscons video lock", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
+       { "uart_hwmtx", &lock_class_mtx_spin },
+       /*
         * leaf locks
         */
        { "intrcnt", &lock_class_mtx_spin },


How does this look?

-- 
Andriy Gapon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to