On 16 Mar, Doug Barton wrote: > In the interests of providing another datapoint, I tried my old, boring > P5 machine, and with -Os -march=pentium buildworld bombed trying to > compile cc1plus in the build tools phase. Backing off to -O worked. The > kernel was ok with -Os -march=pentium. As it seems everyone is posting his/her C{,OPT}FLAGS: I'm using -Os -march=pentiumpro -pipe -Wall -funroll-loops -fschedule-insns2 since months (~ a half year ore more) without a problem (at least I didn't notice one) on a Celeron. Bye, Alexander. -- The dark ages were caused by the Y1K problem. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander+Home @ Leidinger.net Key fingerprint = 7423 F3E6 3A7E B334 A9CC B10A 1F5F 130A A638 6E7E To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_... Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (REL... Sascha Schumann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken... R Joseph Wright
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Thomas K�llmann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Thomas K�llmann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... David O'Brien
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Donn Miller
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Thomas K�llmann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (REL... Alexander Leidinger
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Christian Weisgerber
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Jacob A. Hart