Don Lewis <[email protected]> writes: > After staring at the code a lot more, I see your point about the loss of > information. The problem is that openpam_parse_chain() returns > PAM_SUCCESS whether or not if found anything, but we want the loop to > terminate when either an error is detected or if openpam_parse_chain() > actually found something. Maybe changing the loop exit to something > like this would work: > > if (ret != PAM_SUCCESS || pamh->chains[facility] != NULL) > return (ret);
The simplest fix for now is probably to revert r487; it applies cleanly except for the first hunk, which is easy to apply manually. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
