Don Lewis <truck...@freebsd.org> writes:
> After staring at the code a lot more, I see your point about the loss of
> information.  The problem is that openpam_parse_chain() returns
> PAM_SUCCESS whether or not if found anything, but we want the loop to
> terminate when either an error is detected or if openpam_parse_chain()
> actually found something.  Maybe changing the loop exit to something
> like this would work:
>
>               if (ret != PAM_SUCCESS || pamh->chains[facility] != NULL)
>                       return (ret);

The simplest fix for now is probably to revert r487; it applies cleanly
except for the first hunk, which is easy to apply manually.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to