On 2012-01-05 21:03, kab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800
<matt...@phoronix.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking
> on [1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva configuration 'in the way the
> developers or production'. This is by rule. However, i poor
> scores on be 'it should be tuned, is configured for a diffe The
> response from us to this comes in two forms.&nb 1) If it is the
> wrong workload for the platform, do a public pos explaining and
> analysing the results. Highlighting the rationale fo r the
> concious reduction in performance (ie: journaling filesystems with
> ba filesystem integrity 2) If tuning can have a material impact
> on the results, post a t uning guide with step by step and
> rationale. Ie: educate the communit Michael and I have had many
> discussions with vendors an on this. In almost all cases, the
> vendor has either cha default configuration or accepted the results
> as valid. As guide, Micha comparison. To dat offer. In part,
> thi public, but that is more of a result of a one sided d party
> external to a particular community (with a healthy tou
> journalisticly pumped compare& contrast). For the FreeBSD
> community, who else outside of the FreeBSD community actually runs
> public c Matthew
Not really related to the discussion on hand, but the above about the
most unreadable email I am yet to read on the public mailing list.
Yeah, I actually ignored it because of poor readability.
--
Twoje radio
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
