On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:11:48PM -0800, Darryl Okahata wrote: > While you are right about the download/gunzip times, compression > doesn't help that much. As has been mentioned in -hackers, the ISO > images only compress by 3% or so, or around ~20MB. So, instead of a > 640MB ISO image, you have a 620MB image. Is the 20MB significant? > (I don't know.) No, it isn't. I missed the -hackers discussion, sorry. 20Mb isn't worth the trouble, I was hoping it would be in the ballpark of 100-150 *sigh*. Someone else mentioned gzipping it just for error-checking; that doesn't seem to make much sense, as there're MD5 checksums available. -- Anatoly Vorobey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pobox.com/~mellon/ "Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Will Andrews
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Kelly Yancey
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Will Andrews
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Bill Fumerola
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Brad Knowles
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Anatoly Vorobey
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Darryl Okahata
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Anatoly Vorobey
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Doug Barton
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Dan Moschuk
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Oliver Fromme
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Matthew Hunt
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Matt Heckaman
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Tom Embt
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? John LoVerso
- RE: Why not gzip iso images? Eric J. Schwertfeger
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Oliver Fromme