Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
<ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is
using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, it still manages to
out-perform the bleeding edge FreeBSD :-)
serenity# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
serenity# uname -r
9.0-RC3
Now, from what I've read so far in this thread, it seems that a lot of
people are still in abnegation...
my 0.2c,
- Arnaud
It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts of
the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simply far beyond
disapointing, it is more than inacceptable and by just reading those
benchmarks, I'd like to drop thinking of using FreeBSD even as a backend
server in scientific and business environments. In detail, some of the
SciMark benches look disappointing. The overall image can't help over
the fact that in C-Ray FreeBSD is better performing.
From the compiler, I'd like say there couldn't be a drop of more than 10
- 15% in performance - but not 10 or 100 times.
I'm just thinking about the discussion of SCHED_ULE and all the saur
spots we discussed when I stumbled over the test.
Regards,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
