On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 07:53 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2011-11-23 19:26, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 09:58 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > >> I don't know if Dimitry tried this, but you could also try the
> > >> "nolockd" option, so that byte range locking is done locally in
> > >> the client and avoids the NLM.
> > >>
> > >> Good luck with it and please let us know how it goes, rick
> > >
> > > This seems to allow SVN 1.7 to do whatever nonsense it is trying to
> > > do.
> > > I've modified my fstab on the test host in the cluster to:
> > >
> > > dumpster:/vol/volshscratch /dumpster/scratch nfs
> > > rw,soft,intr,bg,nolockd,nosuid 0 0
> > >
> > > Removing soft,intr had no effect. This, I suspect will be
> > > problematic
> > > for clusteradm@ if we start updating hosts in the cluster.
> > 
> > A very late addition to this: I got Subversion 1.7 to work properly
> > over
> > NFSv3, by making sure rpc.lockd runs on both server and client.
> > 
> > E.g, set rpc_lockd_enable to YES in rc.conf; this is off by default,
> > even if you have nfs_client_enable/nfs_server_enable set to YES.
> 
> and rpc_statd_enable="YES" on all systems, as well.
> 
> > ________________


Thanks for this btw.  :-)

Sean



_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to