--- Dom 11/12/11, Julian H. Stacey <j...@berklix.com> ha scritto: ... > > I have to say I am surprised by all the people that > > still use CVS (for their own good reasons). > > > > It still would be helpful if cvs users could evaluate > > OpenCVS: it's been experimental for ages now. It does > > seem to have some advantage (other than the license) > > in that it's smaller and better maintained (or at > > least not too dead). > > Did you test it with > cd /usr/src/release ; make release >
TBH, I don't use CVS at all. I learned to use SVN first and for the things I needed CVS was pretty similar to SVN but pretty obnoxious when trying to check out the history due to the lack of atomic commits. I would prefer to just use the same SVN server for everything. OpenCVS is an intermediate step, at least acceptable for GPL cleaning purposes, for people that just can't move to SVN right away. Still SVN is much better and once we move we will not look back (IMHO). Pedro. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
