On 23 June 2011 17:31, David O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone object to this patch? > > David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two > years with no problems. > > I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on > TMPFS either. > > > Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c > =================================================================== > --- tmpfs_vfsops.c (revision 221113) > +++ tmpfs_vfsops.c (working copy) > @@ -155,9 +155,6 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp) > return EOPNOTSUPP; > } > > - printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental " > - "feature in FreeBSD.\n"); > - > vn_lock(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY); > error = VOP_GETATTR(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, &va, mp->mnt_cred); > VOP_UNLOCK(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, 0); > > -- > -- David ([email protected])
How about noting that no-one's managed to get it to work correctly with ZFS yet, but fine with UFS? Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
