hello! 22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" <[email protected]>: > So it's all completely stable for you too right now? >
Yes, almost 7 hours with new kernel and no errors. Stable as all previous revisions. Wait a 802.11n support to utilize it with my home and office hotspots :) > adrian > > 2011/1/22 Dima Panov <[email protected]>;: > >> Hello! >> >> 22.01.2011, 13:56, "Adrian Chadd" <[email protected]>;: >>> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]>;; wrote: >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the >>>> if_ath code into -HEAD. >>> Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in >>> all the code was just shuffled around a bit. >>> >>> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd >>> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets >>> would test this out and get back to me. >> FreeBSD 9.0-900030-CURRENT #0 r217695M: Sat Jan 22 13:57:57 VLAT 2011 >> ath0: <Atheros 9285> mem 0xf0000000-0xf000ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci9 >> ath0: AR9285 mac 192.2 RF5133 phy 14.0 >> >> Signal strength is fine, no packets loss. >> ath 9285 was stable for me last months. >> Acer Ferrari One 200 laptop with half-sized atheros wifi card. >>> I'd like to make sure I fix all regressions before I start bringing >>> over more code from ath9k in preparation for enabling the basic >>> 802.11n support for testing. -- Dima Panov ([email protected]) KDE@FreeBSD team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=100000181104157 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
