On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 02:03:50AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > .xz smaller than .gz, but effective is about 96.2%:-(. Some time ago I do similar tests. Changing compression for base man's to bz2 or xz doesn't make much sense.
-- Adios
RELENG_8 2010-04-26: 4,0M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/1_raw 1,7M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/1gz 1,6M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/1xz 1,1M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/2_raw 604K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/2gz 598K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/2xz 5,7M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/3_raw 2,6M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/3gz 2,6M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/3xz 3,5M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/4_raw 1,7M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/4gz 1,7M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/4xz 1,8M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/5_raw 748K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/5gz 718K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/5xz 10K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/6_raw 6,0K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/6gz 6,0K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/6xz 804K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/7_raw 308K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/7gz 296K /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/7xz 3,0M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/8_raw 1,4M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/8gz 1,4M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/8xz 2,1M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/9_raw 1,0M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/9gz 1,0M /tmp/mangzxz.hm0P7PH4xi/9xz
_______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
