Kris Kennaway wrote: > > This sounds bad. Are you referring to the -o syntax differences, or actual > incompatabilities? There have been unsubstantiated reports of > interoperability problems, but nothing well documented here. I know for a fact that one flag I used with ssh (ssh-agent's -p, I think) does not exist in openssh. Nevertheless, I haven't had problems with openssh. Well, actually, I haven't *tested* it, so who knows. :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone bind them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... David Malone
- Re: ssh strangeness in -cur... Bruce A. Mah
- Re: ssh strangeness in -cur... Kris Kennaway
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Kris Kennaway
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: ssh strangeness in -cur... Udo Erdelhoff
- Re: ssh strangeness in -cur... Christian Weisgerber
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Warner Losh
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Kris Kennaway
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Harold Gutch
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Warner Losh
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Ollivier Robert
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Brad Knowles
- Discussions and "facts" [Was: Re: ssh ... Marc Schneiders
- Re: Discussions and "facts" [Was: ... Donn Miller
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Brad Knowles
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Matt Heckaman
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Brad Knowles
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Matt Heckaman
- Re: ssh strangeness in -current... Harold Gutch