On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Jakub Lach <jakub_l...@mailplus.pl> wrote:
> > > Alexander Best-4 wrote: > > > > any thoughts on using http://pciids.sourceforge.net/ for pciids instead > of > > the > > Hart and Boemler lists. the SF site seems to be updated more regularly > and > > would get rid of the need to decide for each entry, whether to take the > > Hart or > > Boemler one. > > > > right now tools/tools/pciid/mk_pci_vendors.pl favours long descriptions > > over > > short ones which means that something like: > > > > 'Intel(R) ICH9 Family SMBus Controller (8086)' > > > > will get discarded in favor of > > > > 'Intel(R) ICH9 Family SMBus Controller working fine with > > http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte (8086)' > > > > +1, since I'm the one[1] with (well, not the only one, ICH9 should be quite > popular) > "http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte"; device. > > best regards, > - Jakub Lach > JFYI, the sourceforge site is where Intel updates its data, and until this post I was already under the impression we pulled from there. I would say that it would be the better source. Jack _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
