> I'm by no means an expert in this area, but isn't removing the locking > on free a bad thing?
Looking at the code, it seems that vm_page_unwire() only requires the page to be locked if it is managed. As it was acquired by contigmalloc, the page should be unmanaged so that should be ok. I am confused as to why vm_page_unwire() does not require the page to be locked if the page is unmanaged. What is synchronizing the accesses to m->wire_count? _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
