:
:> 4. It would be desirable to have per socket timeouts, but would
:> require application changes which are unlikely to happen.
:
:Huh? I was just considering writing the patch for this. What
:application problems would this create?
:
:The worst thing I can see is that it would mean that changing the
:timeout value on a running system wouldn't affect already opened
:sockets. Even that may be changable by an external utility if I can
:think of a way to handle the locking in userland.
:
:Cheers,
:joelh
I see no use whatsoever for being able to specify per-socket keepalive
timeouts.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
