> > BTW, there are many fundamental design flaws in new-bus, so I don't > > think new-bus is comparable with newconfig, yet, even if priority > > probe is implemented. For example: > > I'm not going to reply to these points as I suspect it will lead to a > pointless flame thread. I would prefer to discuss these issues in person > at Usenix.
I agree that this is better way to solve the conflicts between new-bus and newconfig. Although I wondered why FreeBSD's core decide to choose new-bus before Usenix. -- s...@sra.co.jp Software Research Associates, Inc., Japan (Noriyuki Soda) Advanced Technology Group. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
