>>If you had old "vector xxxintr", it will now cause a syntax error rather than >>a warning. > >What is the new method of specifying a non-standard interrupt >function? I have some code (currently on 2.x, but I was hoping to be >able to move it) where I have different interrupt functions within the >same driver. I could use a single interrupt handler, but it would >mean either additional latency or overhead, which I'd like to avoid.
The driver has to know which one(s) to attach. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
