> -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:dil...@apollo.backplane.com] > Sent: 01 May 1999 18:24 > To: Harlan Stenn > Cc: Doug Rabson; Kevin Day; Mike Smith; da...@aps-services.com; > p...@originative.co.uk; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need > testers files) > > > > > :BitKeeper should be ready soon. > : > :Once it's been proven stable, might it be a better > alternative to CVS? > : > :H > > Maybe, but we wouldn't know for a couple of years. You > don't just go > trusting 15+ years worth of source history to a program > that has just > barely been written. I think the Linux people are making > a huge mistake > by not using CVS.
15 years? Our cvs repository is only about 5 years old and cvs isn't 15 years old! I agree with the sentiment though :-) Although, if it's widely used I suspect it will stabilise much sooner than a couple of years. If it has the required features it might be worth playing with on the back burner to see how it shaped up. Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
