FreeBSD is somewhat of a closed development enviroment what some organizations do is that they maintain their own cvs repository.
CVS repository is guarded by the core members and only "certified" committers are allowed to commit code that in addition to not having a procedure or a processs to mitigate technical conflicts such as new config vs new-bus makes the develpment process at least a closed one from the perspective of the FreeBSD cvs repository. > > And then what about newconfig? To me this just adds more truth to the > > whole /. argument that *BSD promotes a closed development model. > > It's a flawed argument and one that doesn't acknowledge, at least in > the case of FreeBSD, the existence of publicly accessible CVS repositories > along with the GNATS databases for non-committer submissions. > > It's a more centralized development model but not necessarily a closed one. > > Cheers, > > Jerry Hicks > wghi...@bellsouth.net > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message -- Amancio Hasty ha...@star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
