In message <199904080049.raa76...@vashon.polstra.com>, John Polstra writes:
>In article <xfmail.990407210734.asmo...@wxs.nl>, Jeroen
>Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmo...@wxs.nl> wrote:
>
>> This raises an interesting point I think. Do we need to maintain
>> gcc/egcs compatibility? Or do we, since we track CURRENT, say:
>> "alas, that's progression for ye?"
>
>Yep, alas, that's progression for ye.  We have never supported mix
>& match of sourceballs from different releases.  We do our best
>to support running old executables on newer systems, but that's a
>completely different issue.
>
>> Has there been an `official' consensus reached about this from core or
>> commiters?
>
>I am only speaking for John Polstra, a compiler guy, here.

I agree.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
p...@freebsd.org               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to