Jeffrey J. Mountin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My big question is - Do we really want to force a 'make world' on the those
> that want RSA support in openssl?
We don't want to and WE DON'T DO.
> That would be ugly, when before it was simply the matter of building only
> two ports.
binary installation:
- before: user needs to install openssl port
- now: user needs to install openssl package
make world:
- before: user needs to install openssl port
- now: openssl is built as part of the world
This thread suffers from people yelling objection without even
understanding the situation.
There are a few teething problems which are blown up way out of
proportion:
- Some people outside the US get their crypto source from a US
mirror. They shouldn't do this in the first place. In the presence
of USA_RESIDENT=NO, OpenSSL than proceeds to build without RSA.
- Apparently, there currently is a bug where bsd.port.mk fails to
recognize that the RSA-enabled package hasn't been installed.
I'm sure this can easily be fixed, but tying up Kris in endless
discussions here won't accelerate the process.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
