According to David E . O'Brien: > If people feel this is desired, I can easily bmake and import it. > >From working with Vic Abell, I know he is interested in any > problems/issues that we may find in LSOF if we find issues when > scrutinizing it.
Well, the way I see it, Vic is already maintaining LSOF for so many platforms that I don't see any real advantage in importing it. As long as he can sync with FreeBSD internal changes (and he can because he has access to such systems -- thanks you for that), we have a a working lsof. That way, Vic doesn't have divergent versions (you don't plan to update contrib/lsof for each change Vic makes to other platforms don't you ?). To be honest, I would not miss fstat(1), even if it is good ol' BSD code, I install lsof everywhere. Putting lsof features into fstat is just IMO a waste of time and code. Now, can we import Postfix instead ? :-) :-) [ducks and runs] -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #69: Mon Jan 18 02:02:12 CET 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
