>parts of proc (p_vmspace etc.) For that matter, does any of kern_exit.c:exit1() >need to be spl()d? It sure seems like it to me. Along with other parts of >kern_exit.c, and many other things having to do with refcnt's. Is it just my >paranoia, or have I got this spl concept correct?
spl is for blocking interrupts. Process-related things shouldn't be and mostly aren't touched by interrupts. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
