From: Charlie ROOT <r...@nomad.dataplex.net>
> Although it is somewhat larger, the ISC dhcp2 client has significantly
> more flexability WRT options beyond the bare basics.
> 
> I would recommend that the default client on HD based systems be the
> ISC client because of that flexability.

I have to agree here.

The problem with ISC is the example configuration file in the manpage
is much too complicated.  It scares people off.  99% of the people
don't need that.

My config file is:
send host-name "pdxlx103";

One line that's it.

-Wayne

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to