> - DHCP-WIDE requires you to have bpf configured into your kernel > for a GENERIC kernel, this is VERY BAD - is there a more elegant > way to handle this? I certainly would not like to see the > generic kernel in the distribution going out into the world with > bpf enabled.
That's not "VERY BAD". Bpf imposes a slight performance, hit, but that's about all. Don't start whining about the "security issues"; they're so trivial to be beyond worry. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ m...@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msm...@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msm...@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
