Doug Rabson <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>>
>> The reason I'm interested in this (now tiresome) thread is that I'd much
>> rather have to read
>>
>> /*
>> * Bail out if the time left to next transaction is less than
>> * the duration of the previous transaction.
>> */
>> if (t % u - n % u < d % u) {
>>
>> than
>>
>> if (((t % u) - (n % u)) < (d % u)) {
>
>This is a strawman. The original expression is perfectly fine (by my
>rules). One could make a case for:
>
> if ((t % u) - (n % u) < d % u)
Am I a heretic for suggesting this?
if (t%u - n%u < d%u)
Grouping without brackets!
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [email protected] [email protected]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
