On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Yes, but the benifits of a correct implementation are quite awesome, > a centralized logging place to dole out authentication and potentially > administratively shutdown/lockout accounts if a brute force attempt (or > other abuse) is detected. You've just described Kerberos. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list) Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list) Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list) Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list) Mark Murray
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list) Mark Murray
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list) Peter Wemm
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO li... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO li... Mark Murray
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TOD... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiii... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: Crypto progress! (And a B... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Crypto progress! (And... Lyndon Nerenberg