On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > If you're gonna use a port, use ports for its dependencies too. You'd be > stupid not to use the ports whenever you can. No one has ever provided > me a convincing reason why this is not true. Well when you want to keep multiple versions of kde or qt around.. and want to be able to remove them in one fell swoop.. and the "packing lists" aren't for sure known.. yes it helps to have its own directory. For a normal desktop user you're perhaps right. But not using the ports for some things does not make one stupid, as quite possibly there's a good reason behind it. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Maxim Sobolev
- Re: kdelibs port broken? William Woods
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Will Andrews
- Re: kdelibs port broken? William Woods
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Chris D. Faulhaber
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Joel Ray Holveck
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Will Andrews
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Donn Miller
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Donn Miller
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Joel Ray Holveck
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Alex Zepeda
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Chuck Robey
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Chuck Robey
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Chuck Robey
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Lutz Albers
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Will Andrews
- Re: kdelibs port broken? Ilmar S. Habibulin