Re: ulimit weirdness

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2000-Feb-10 09:03:12 +1100, John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>but not the hard limit.  It's even documented in sh(1):
>
>     ulimit [-HSacdflmnust] [limit]
...
>             given.  The default is to display the soft limits, and to set
>             both the hard and the soft limits.

I've been bitten by this in the past as well.  IMHO, this behaviour
violates POLA, even if it is POSIX(?)-specified.

Peter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message