On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> Agreed. The making lots of connections was a bad idea. However, I've
> rarely seen low latency and low bandwidth go together. I've also
> problems connecting accross high loss links more often. Sure, it is a
> statistical argument.
>
> I still think that the n connections wouldn't be that expensive. The
> cost, iirc, of a connection that drops is very low. I can certainly
> see enough problems with it to encourage jdp to not implement it,
> despite being the person that proposed it...
That's the precise reason I suggested a system that used no probing, had
feedback, and forced shared load in spite of user misconfiguration. Got
shouted down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | electronics, communications, and signal processing.
New Year's Resolution: I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up
fictitious words in the dictionary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
