On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 01:19:32AM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > No, I said ask me again in 18 months, not NOW. Even if it didn't have the > memory problem, gzip has greater compatibility and does the minimum > job. It's not required for the base system. BUT, if we bzip2'ed the base system distribution, we'd be able to fit more Packages on the 1st CDROM, and that is a BIG win. With it in the base system, we could also make pkg_add understand bzip2'ed packages -- again a BIG win as we could then fit more packages on the 1st CDROM. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzip2 support for distribution patches)
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port... Oliver Fromme
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd... Akinori MUSHA aka knu
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd... David O'Brien
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252:... Chuck Robey
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16... Alex Zepeda
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: port... Chuck Robey
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re:... David O'Brien
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was... George Cox
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd... David O'Brien
- Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252:... Garrett Wollman