-On [20000123 00:01], Akinori MUSHA aka knu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Yes, they are pretty big enough to see the difference between two...
>
>                       .tar.bz2        .tar.gz
>lynx2.8.2rel1           1.4MB           1.8MB
>WindowMaeker 0.61.1     1.6MB           1.9MB
>gimp-1.1.13             6.2MB           8.0MB
>kdebase-1.1.2           7.0MB           8.9MB
>linux-2.2.14           12.3MB          15.2MB
>
>It's crystal clear bzip2 wins in these cases. and far enough.

Then look at the memory overhead caused by bzipping versus gzipping and
you'll loose.

Anyways, we have had this discussion a few times in the past.

Lets consult the archives and see what the reason was why we didn't do
it back then.

I am in favor with Chuck here.  Its fine as it is, as a port.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok vd W/Asmodai         asmodai@[wxs.nl|bart.nl|freebsd.org]
Documentation nutter/B-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best  
The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>
Ain't gonna spend the rest of my Life, quietly fading away...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to