<<On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:21:05 -0500, Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > In 'ls' we are not talking about a block count, we are talking about > a byte-count. ls -s -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Brad Knowles
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Warner Losh
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large fi... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Donn Miller
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large fi... Alex Zepeda
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large fi... David O'Brien
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large fi... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for larg... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Additional option to ls -l... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for larg... Joerg Micheel
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for... Peter Jeremy
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Mike Fisher
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Brad Knowles
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Oliver Fromme
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Peter Jeremy
- Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files Rodney W. Grimes