> No, this is completly reasonable now that I understand what it is your > proposing. Even the memory footprint is minimal if pointers to the > actual rules is all we store in the per interface list, my largest set > duplicated over 8 interfaces would only be 3200 rules. Stored as > pointers to rules this would be all of 12.8kbytes, certainly not > enough to worry about :-). Good.... I felt like I was stupid for a while here ;-) > Come up with some patches and I'll be glad to test and review them > for you... I'll get on that as soon as I am done with that paying job I am doing now :(. Which probably means sometime next week. (don't you hate to have these bills to pay ?) Patrick. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: ipfw optimizations Luigi Rizzo
- Re: ipfw optimizations Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: ipfw optimizations Luigi Rizzo
- Re: ipfw optimizations Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: ipfw optimizations Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: ipfw optimizations Nate Williams
- Re: ipfw optimizations Harold Gutch
- Re: ipfw optimizations Luigi Rizzo
- Re: ipfw optimizations Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: ipfw optimizations Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: ipfw optimizations Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: ipfw optimizations Luigi Rizzo
- Re: ipfw optimizations Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: ipfw optimizations Luigi Rizzo
- Re: ipfw optimizations Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: ipfw optimizations Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: ipfw optimizations Luigi Rizzo
- Re: ipfw optimizations Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: ipfw optimizations Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: ipfw optimizations Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: ipfw optimizations Thomas Veldhouse