Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > Maybe I am wrong, but it seems to me that there is already quite a bit of > IPv6 and IPSec stuff in the tree. Most of the kernel stuff is there (albeit > seriously lacking documentation). To me this is not *too* critical right > now. I see the point for the research community though. > Speaking with my Infrastructure Services hat on, if 4.0 supported IPsec on IPv4 I would deploy FreeBSD more widely. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Bakul Shah
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Julian Elischer
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Eivind Eklund
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th David O'Brien
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Brian Somers
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Robert Watson
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Dennis Glatting
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th torstenb
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Torsten Blum
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th scanner
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Matthew Dillon
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Steve Ames
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Darren Reed
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Mr. K.
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Mike Smith