> More releases more often are better than indefinitely holding up > releases waiting for just that one last thing to be finished. I think a recent thread on -STABLE indicates that the majority of end users seem to believe that -RELEASE means STABLE and should be fully operational not a wide-beta under a release name. I also thing that an extremely complete and stable .0 release would be good for the FreeBSD release image. -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Darren Reed
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Mike Smith
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Julian Elischer
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Donn Miller
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Brad Knowles
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Andreas Klemm
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... robgar
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... robgar
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Steve Ames
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Steve Ames
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... David O'Brien
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Peter Jeremy
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Matthew Jacob
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... will andrews
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Amancio Hasty