Matthew Dillon wrote: [..] > And, in anycase, I am not going to spend hours putting together a long > involved patch when a simple short patch suffices. If you want to > spend the time to come up with your own patch (that doesn't screw the > pooch in regards to cluster performance!), then I'm all ears, otherwise > this patch is what is going to go in for the 4.0 release. Please hold fire for a bit longer. I have (what I think is) a much cleaner fix in mind. There is no urgency here, a couple of hours isn't going to make the slightest difference to the big picture. On a side note, as the original author of the changes that lead to this, I would have thought it would have been appropriate to ask ME directly first before going public. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Kip Macy
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) David Greenman
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Peter Wemm
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Peter Wemm
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Peter Wemm
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Peter Wemm
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Brad Knowles
- Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) Peter Wemm